[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090520004943Q.fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 00:49:58 +0900
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
To: hch@...radead.org
Cc: jmoyer@...hat.com, lizf@...fujitsu.com, mingo@...e.hu,
jens.axboe@...cle.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, fweisbec@...il.com,
tzanussi@...il.com, tytso@....edu, swhiteho@...hat.com,
kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] convert block trace points to TRACE_EVENT()
On Tue, 19 May 2009 09:08:41 -0400
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 08:59:29AM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > I'm not sure I'm comfortable with this. Having had to diagnose
> > performance problems using blktrace, I find the dev_t information for
> > plugs and unplugs especially interesting. Maybe we can still figure
> > this out given the context in the trace, though. Can you comment on
> > that?
>
> The problem is that right now we still allow request queues shared by
> multiple gendisks, so we can't get at the gendisk. The blktrace ioctl
> interface gets around that by doing the setup with an ioctl on the
> block device node and storing the dev_t at that point.
>
> But I don't think we actually have any drivers left sharing a queue
> that way, and I'd love to get rid of that for various reasons.
There are still some (e.g. drivers/block/floppy.c)? I though that we
hit this when we tried to add the command filter feature though I
might be wrong (I can't recall).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists