[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0905191830510.7816@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 18:31:23 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, peterz@...radead.org, jiayingz@...gle.com,
mbligh@...gle.com, fche@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tracepoints: delay argument evaluation
On Tue, 19 May 2009, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Wasn't the plan to switch everything to the new TRACE_EVENT macro anyway?
> That will be an API change to convert existing tracepoints. Then the
> various details of the actual call site code are easy to change inside that
> new macro.
Unfortunately that is not the case. The call sites are the issues. They
are same for both DEFINE_TRACE and TRACE_EVENT.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists