lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0905191830510.7816@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date:	Tue, 19 May 2009 18:31:23 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
cc:	Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...e.hu,
	laijs@...fujitsu.com, peterz@...radead.org, jiayingz@...gle.com,
	mbligh@...gle.com, fche@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] tracepoints: delay argument evaluation


On Tue, 19 May 2009, Roland McGrath wrote:

> Wasn't the plan to switch everything to the new TRACE_EVENT macro anyway?
> That will be an API change to convert existing tracepoints.  Then the
> various details of the actual call site code are easy to change inside that
> new macro.

Unfortunately that is not the case. The call sites are the issues. They 
are same for both DEFINE_TRACE and TRACE_EVENT.

-- Steve

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ