[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090520083846.GH6736@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 10:38:46 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@...oo.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alan Jenkins <sourcejedi.lkml@...glemail.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: EeePC 900 trackpad often not detected at boot in 2.6.30-rc4
* Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:42:10AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 09:41:46AM +0100, Sitsofe Wheeler wrote:
> > >
> > > And of course just as soon as I finish building a new kernel the issue
> > > disappears. Even in older kernels that were seemingly showing the
> > > problem all the time. Sigh.
> >
> > After numerous reboots I finally managed to reproduce the problem the
> > original way with your patch installed. I have no idea what the
> > necessary triggers are but I suspect it involves suspend to ram...
> >
>
> It is just unfortunate scheduling that messes us up:
>
> > [ 4.267050] drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: 00 <- i8042 (interrupt, 1, 12) [113]
> > [ 4.270440] drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: d4 -> i8042 (command) [116]
> > [ 4.271016] drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: f2 -> i8042 (parameter) [116]
> > [ 4.274883] ALSA device list:
> > [ 4.274963] #0: HDA Intel at 0xf7eb8000 irq 16
> > [ 4.275258] TCP cubic registered
> > [ 4.276597] NET: Registered protocol family 17
> > [ 4.276802] Using IPI Shortcut mode
> > [ 4.279191] Magic number: 9:810:70
> > [ 4.279548] rtc_cmos 00:03: setting system clock to 2009-05-18 09:03:27 UTC (1242637407)
> > [ 4.281412] drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: fa <- i8042 (interrupt, 1, 12) [127]
> > [ 4.283338] drivers/input/serio/i8042.c: 00 <- i8042 (interrupt, 1, 12) [129]
> > [ 5.406620] libps2: errorneously fail 754 command
>
> As you can see the device responded to our command and interrupt
> fired at 4.28 but for some reason the thread did not get woken up
> until 5.40, second and a half later... Crazy if you ask me.
>
> Ingo, do you have any idea why would it not be woken up for so
> long???
possibly something else was running (looping?) in that time? A more
detailed trace would tell i guess.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists