[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090520120851.49783a8e@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:08:51 +0200
From: Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>
To: David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
Cc: Wolfgang Mües <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
"Pierre Ossman" <drzeus@...eus.cx>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc_spi: use EILSEQ for possible transmission errors
On Wed, 20 May 2009 02:20:46 -0700
David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net> wrote:
> On Wednesday 20 May 2009, Wolfgang Mües wrote:
> > R1_SPI_COM_CRC is a transmission error - no doubt. Mapping to EILSEQ is OK.
> >
> > R1_SPI_ERASE_SEQ and R1_SPI_ERASE_RESET are responses to a sector erase
> > command. block.c is not sending such commands, so block.c can safely assume
> > that each such response is a transmission error.
>
> Hmm, would hope that's not a long-term plan. Remember that the
> firmware in the card can leverage "that's erased" knowledge for
> things like wear leveling. SSDs and other storage devices would
> likewise benefit from such knowledge. I'm quite certain there's
> been discussion about adding support for that in the block layer.
>
It's already in AFAIK. I even had code for hooking it up to mmc_block.
But it didn't produce any measurable results so I never merged it.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists