[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F169D4F5E1F1974DBFAFABF47F60C10A335277B5@orsmsx507.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 00:13:24 -0700
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<oprofile-list@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"rusty@...tcorp.com.au" <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: RE: [BUG 2.6.30-rc1] panic when loading oprofile
Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 15 May 2009 14:41:26 +0200 Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> wrote:
>
> > "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com> writes:
> >
> > Hi Jesse,
> >
> > > when starting a profile run on the latest net-next kernel, I'm
> currently
> > > trying to reproduce on 2.6.30-rc5 stock.
> >
> > Were you able to reproduce it?
For some reason I can no longer reproduce, I'll add a note to the bug too.
My suspicion is my normal process of
git pull
make O=../foo
make modules_install install
somehow picked up the L1_CACHE_BYTES=128 and stuck with it. I can no longer reproduce that at all, .config always has the same result.
It also may have been that the problem self repaired when I had to blow away my .oprofile/daemonrc because shortly after these panics my oprofile stopped working on older kernels too.
Sorry for the inconvenience, it was reproducible when I started :-(
> >
> > >
> > > config available upon request, arch=x86_64, recent (F10 or newer)
> oprofile
> > > userspace.
> >
> > it looks like two bugs: oprofile didn't catch a NMI that belongs to
> > it (most likely) and the NMI watchdog referenced a NULL pointer
> > while processing an NMI.
> >
> > Did you have the nmi watchdog enabled on the command line?
> >
> > >
> > > BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
> > > IP: [<ffffffff8066080a>] nmi_watchdog_tick+0xa1/0x1d6
<snip>
> Ping?
>
> This is in Rafael's regression list but I suspect that it's a
> linux-next-only thing?
We can close, unreproducable. Its bugzilla 13324
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists