[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A151F59.7020304@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 18:31:05 +0900
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/20] sysfs: Kill sysfs_addrm_start and sysfs_addrm_finish
Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>
> With lazy inode updates and dentry operations bringing everything
> into sync on demand there is no longer any need to immediately
> update the vfs or grab i_mutex to protect those updates as we
> make changes to sysfs.
>
> So stop updating the vfs inodes and move what remains of
> sysfs_addrm_start and sysfs_addrm_finsih (just barely more than taking
> the sysfs_mutex) into sysfs_add_one and sysfs_remove_one.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
This looks so better than the original code. :-)
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists