linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/4] lis3: remove automatic shutdown of the device

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A15411F.3050704@tremplin-utc.net>
Date:	Thu, 21 May 2009 13:55:11 +0200
From:	Éric Piel <eric.piel@...mplin-utc.net>
To:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] lis3: remove automatic shutdown of the device

Op 21-05-09 13:36, Pavel Machek schreef:
> Hi!
> 
>> After measurement on my laptop, it seems that turning off the device
>> does not bring any energy saving (within 0.1W precision). So let's keep
>> the device always on. It simplifies the code, and it avoids the problem
>> of reading a wrong value sometimes just after turning the device on.
> 
> Well, 0.1W is still quite much for cellphone etc... but as we do not
> have any such small users in the tree, I guess this can go in...
> 
Yes. BTW, what I meant is that the power consumption on my laptop can be
read with 0.1W precision. Turning on and off the device showed 0.0W
variations. The device should using even much less than 0.1W. According
to the documentation, it's about 2.2mW when on and 3µW when off.

Eric


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/