[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A1585AA.9010002@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 21 May 2009 09:47:38 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
To: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>
CC: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Becky Bruce <beckyb@...nel.crashing.org>,
Olaf Kirch <okir@...e.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
xen-devel <xendevel@...ts.xensource.com>,
x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Breeds <tony@...eyournoodle.com>
Subject: Re: swiotlb: remove __weak hooks in favour of architecture-specific
functions
Ian Campbell wrote:
> At the end of this series there are no more __weak functions in
> lib/swiotlb.c
>
> The series adds several hook functions to the x86 architecture. Would
> they be preferred as a struct x86_swiotlb_ops or as individual hooks?
>
> I was unsure what to do about powerpc in most places since the
> existing support seems to in-progress so it wasn't always clear where
> to put the implementation. If there is a tree somewhere with more
> complete support I'll be happy to provide additional patches.
>
> Boot tested on x86 under xen but not even compiled for ia64 or
> powerpc. If someone can point me to a decent source of cross compilers
> I can sort that out. (http://www.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/ seems
> to be out-of-date and only has ia64 in any case)
Try these. They are fairly current. I have used several of them.
http://bakeyournoodle.com/cross/
--
~Randy
LPC 2009, Sept. 23-25, Portland, Oregon
http://linuxplumbersconf.org/2009/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists