[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a27d3730905220103k12d7f9a6n269fcd079818b168@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 16:03:26 +0800
From: Li Yang <leoli@...escale.com>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] freescale: beyond ARRAY_SIZE of fdev->chan
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com> wrote:
> Do not go beyond ARRAY_SIZE of fdev->chan
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Indeed, thanks.
But I would like the title and description of this patch be changed to
like this:
fsldma: fix check on potential fdev->chan[] overflow
Fix the check of potential array overflow when using corrupted channel
device tree nodes.
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> index da8a8ed..391b1bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/fsldma.c
> @@ -830,7 +830,7 @@ static int __devinit fsl_dma_chan_probe(struct fsl_dma_device *fdev,
> new_fsl_chan->reg.end - new_fsl_chan->reg.start + 1);
>
> new_fsl_chan->id = ((new_fsl_chan->reg.start - 0x100) & 0xfff) >> 7;
> - if (new_fsl_chan->id > FSL_DMA_MAX_CHANS_PER_DEVICE) {
> + if (new_fsl_chan->id >= FSL_DMA_MAX_CHANS_PER_DEVICE) {
> dev_err(fdev->dev, "There is no %d channel!\n",
> new_fsl_chan->id);
> err = -EINVAL;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists