[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090522085716.GB13482@elte.hu>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 10:57:16 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf_counter: optimize context switch between
identical inherited contexts
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 14:27 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
>
> > The equivalence of contexts is detected by keeping a pointer in
> > each cloned context pointing to the context it was cloned from.
> > To cope with the situation where a context is changed by adding
> > or removing counters after it has been cloned, we also keep a
> > generation number on each context which is incremented every time
> > a context is changed. When a context is cloned we take a copy
> > of the parent's generation number, and two cloned contexts are
> > equivalent only if they have the same parent and the same
> > generation number. In order that the parent context pointer
> > remains valid (and is not reused), we increment the parent
> > context's reference count for each context cloned from it.
>
> > + u32 generation;
>
> Suppose someone writes a malicious proglet that inherits the
> counters, puts the child to sleep, does 2^32 mods on the counter
> set, and then wakes up the child.
>
> Would that merely corrupt the results, or make the kernel explode?
i think it should be an u64.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists