linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf_counter: optimize context switch between identical inherited contexts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18966.30958.755834.332163@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 May 2009 20:05:34 +1000
From:	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf_counter: optimize context switch between
 identical inherited contexts

Peter Zijlstra writes:

> On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 14:27 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> > 
> >                 -----Unmodified-----            With this patch series
> > Counters:       none    2 HW    4H+4S   none    2 HW    4H+4S
> > 
> > 2 processes:
> > Average         3.44    6.45    11.24   3.12    3.39    3.60
> > St dev          0.04    0.04    0.13    0.05    0.17    0.19
> > 
> > 8 processes:
> > Average         6.45    8.79    14.00   5.57    6.23    7.57
> > St dev          1.27    1.04    0.88    1.42    1.46    1.42
> > 
> > 32 processes:
> > Average         5.56    8.43    13.78   5.28    5.55    7.15
> > St dev          0.41    0.47    0.53    0.54    0.57    0.81
> 
> Any clues as to why the time is still dependent on the number of
> counters in the context? The approach seems to be O(1) in that it
> does a simple counter context swap on sched_out and nothing on sched_in.

Only the context switches between the lat_ctx processes will be
optimized; switches between them and other processes will still do the
full PMU switch.  The CPU would be switching to other processes
from time to time during the run (e.g. to run various kernel daemons,
which seem to continue to proliferate) so some fraction of the context
switches would be as expensive as before.  Probably I should measure
what that fraction is, but it's Friday night and I'm feeling lazy. :)

Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/