[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1242992786.22654.281.camel@zakaz.uk.xensource.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 12:46:26 +0100
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...citrix.com>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
CC: "jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"beckyb@...nel.crashing.org" <beckyb@...nel.crashing.org>,
"okir@...e.de" <okir@...e.de>, "mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"gregkh@...e.de" <gregkh@...e.de>,
"xendevel@...ts.xensource.com" <xendevel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] swiotlb: make swiotlb phys<->bus translations
architecture-specific
On Fri, 2009-05-22 at 07:13 -0400, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > +static inline phys_addr_t swiotlb_bus_to_phys(struct device *hwdev,
> > + dma_addr_t baddr)
> > +{
> > + return baddr;
> > +}
> > +
> > +
>
> As I wrote in another mail, adding swiotlb specific code in
> dma-mapping.h is wrong.
They aren't really swiotlb specific, I just foolishly carried over the
old name, really I think they should be called just bus_to_phys and
phys_to_bus or something.
Ian.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists