[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090522144343.7b26b3a8@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 14:43:43 +0100
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Pantelis Koukousoulas <pktoss@...il.com>
Cc: Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: How to tell whether a struct file is held by a process?
> Suppose a device needs a reset as part of its init sequence (a whole lot
> of them do, this is not purely hypothetical). Then a different process may
> get to operate the device before and after the reset and hilarity may result
> from that.
Thats surely up to you to get your lock file usage right. The kernel
isn't there to play mother to crap programming.
> So, if there is a clean / acceptable way to handle the reset issue in userspace
Firstly can you explain *why* you think there is a problem ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists