[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A177ECE.7080508@candelatech.com>
Date: Fri, 22 May 2009 21:42:54 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
CC: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question on lockdep and sysrq - d
Ming Lei wrote:
> See http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124211522525625&w=2.
>
That is about some real bug in the official kernel. I am almost 100%
certain that my own code is at fault here.
I'm just trying to better understand the way lockdep prints out
all of the locks so I can easier debug my issue.
Thanks,
Ben
> thanks.
>
> 2009/5/23 Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>:
>
>> Hello!
>>
>> I'm trying to debug an apparent deadlock in some code I'm
>> writing.
>>
>> When I do a sysrq 'd', I get a nice dump of locks (I have lockdep enabled).
>>
>> However, the output appears to show multiple processes holding the
>> same locks (rtnl_mutex, for example):
>>
>> Showing all locks held in the system:
>> 3 locks held by events/11/63:
>> #0: (events){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8104f71e>] run_workqueue+0xb1/0x216
>> #1: ((linkwatch_work).work){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8104f71e>]
>> run_workqueue+0xb1/0x216
>> #2: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
>> 1 lock held by irqbalance/3360:
>> #0: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
>> 1 lock held by hald/3605:
>> #0: (rtnl_mutex){--..}, at: [<ffffffff8125def1>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x14
>> ...
>>
>> Is this merely showing processes that are blocked on trying to acquire these
>> locks?
>>
>> If so, is there any way to tell which processes have fully acquired locks
>> v/s
>> just waiting to acquire them?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ben
>>
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists