linux-kernel - Re: Write barriers on MD RAID1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0fa4b1e19d3edb12931e0d641ce2c7d7.squirrel@neil.brown.name>
Date:	Sun, 24 May 2009 11:51:37 +1000 (EST)
From:	"NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To:	"Ken Milmore" <ken.milmore@...glemail.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Jens Axboe" <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: Write barriers on MD RAID1

On Sun, May 24, 2009 9:54 am, Ken Milmore wrote:
>
> Support for write barriers on MD RAID1 devices appears to be broken on
> 2.6.29 and later kernels.  Mounting an ext3 or ext4 filesystem over an
> md raid1 block device gives the kernel message:
>
>    JBD: barrier-based sync failed on md0 - disabling barriers
>
> Is this intentional?  It looks like a regression to me, since write
> barriers (ostensibly) worked for MD RAID1 on earlier kernels (well, all
> of the 2.6.27 series at least...)
>
> Doing a git bisect suggested that this is the culprit:
>
> commit cec0707e40ae25794b5a2de7b7f03c51961f80d9
> Author: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
> Date:   Tue Jan 13 15:28:32 2009 +0100
>
>      block: silently error an unsupported barrier bio

Yes, that patch is broken.
the new code it introduces should probably go in the top of
__make_request rather than just before the call to ->make_request_fn.
make_request_fn functions other than __make_request generally
don't use ->next_ordered at all.

Jens?  Would you agree?

NeilBrown


>
> Rolling this back from 2.6.29.4 made the JBD error message go away for
> me.  I tried to do some disk benchmarking to determine if write barriers
> were really still working, but the results were not very conclusive.
>
> Details of test setup:
> - 2.6.29.4 kernel (config from slackware-current)
> - ext3 filesystem (mounted with barrier=1), also tried ext4
> - MD RAID1 block device over two SATA disks
> - Intel motherboard AHCI controller (82801)
>
> I got similar behaviour on a virtualised setup using qemu, with the RAID
> over two emulated IDE disks.
>
> Please contact me if I can provide any further information.
>
> -Ken Milmore.
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/