[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac3eb2510905240603q21329fboaa40180b4416230@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 15:03:31 +0200
From: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/20] sysfs: Make sysfs_rename_link atomic
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 01:21, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 23:32, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 22:13, Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
>>> From: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
>>>
>>> Use the existing sysfs_rename to make sysfs_rename_link an atomic
>>> operation that does less work. While I am at add additional sanity
>>> checking to ensure it is a symlink I am renaming.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
>>
>> Looks great, and so much better than the remove and re-create thing.
>
> Do you have your git tree public somewhere, or do you mind sending me
> an all-in-one patch? I like to give it a try here.
Looks good. It survives a heavy hotplug setup just fine, renaming
works fine here, and sysfs looks right. There are a bunch of warnings
for some non-empty directories, which I replied with in the patch that
added the warning.
Thanks,
Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists