[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090524224509.0855.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Sun, 24 May 2009 22:47:31 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] convert block trace points to TRACE_EVENT()
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 02:15:05PM +0900, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> > > Is there any good reason for keeping the ftrace plugin once we have
> > > the fully function event tracer support for the block events?
> >
> > waiting userland blktrace tool convert using event tracer?
>
> blktrace(8) uses the ioctl interface, which we should keep for a long
> time for backwards compatiblity.
Ah, I misunderstand your point. sorry.
I though you suggested to remove ioctl. but it's reverse. ok. :)
So, I guess same formatting make easy understanding for administrator, maybe.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists