[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090525074647.GK11363@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:46:47 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
chris.mason@...cle.com, david@...morbit.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jack@...e.cz,
yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] scsi: unify allocation of scsi command and sense
buffer
On Mon, May 25 2009, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, May 25, 2009 at 09:30:48AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Fold the sense buffer into the command, thereby eliminating a slab
> > allocation and free per command.
>
> Might help to send it to linux-scsi to get people to review and apply it
> :)
yeah, as I later posted, this wasn't meant to be sent out as part of
the writeback series :-)
> But that patch looks good to me, avoiding one allocation for each
> command and simplifying the code. I try to remember why these were
> two slabs to start with but can't find any reason.
>
> Btw, we might just want to declare the sense buffer directly as a sized
> array in the scsi command as there really doesn't seem to be a reason
> not to allocate it.
That is also a workable solution. I've been trying to cut down on the
number of allocations required per-IO, and there's definitely still some
low hanging fruit there. Some of it is already included, like the inline
io_vecs in the bio.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists