[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090525122820.044e1e35@skybase>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 12:28:20 +0200
From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
To: Michael Abbott <michael@...neidae.co.uk>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Re: /proc/uptime idle counter remains at 0
On Mon, 18 May 2009 14:23:03 +0100 (BST)
Michael Abbott <michael@...neidae.co.uk> wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/proc/uptime.c b/fs/proc/uptime.c
> index 0c10a0b..0f43395 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/uptime.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/uptime.c
> @@ -4,13 +4,19 @@
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
> #include <linux/time.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel_stat.h>
> #include <asm/cputime.h>
>
> static int uptime_proc_show(struct seq_file *m, void *v)
> {
> struct timespec uptime;
> struct timespec idle;
> - cputime_t idletime = cputime_add(init_task.utime, init_task.stime);
> + int len, i;
> + cputime_t idletime = 0;
> +
> + for_each_possible_cpu(i)
> + idletime = cputime64_add(idletime, kstat_cpu(i).cpustat.idle);
> + idletime = cputime64_to_clock_t(idletime);
>
> do_posix_clock_monotonic_gettime(&uptime);
> monotonic_to_bootbased(&uptime);
I found another problem with this patch: why do you convert the
idletime from cputime_t to clock_t ? The call to cputime_to_timespec
takes a cputime_t and the conversion from cputime to clock_t returns a
value that is way to small on s390. After removing that line it works
for me but I wonder why you added it.
--
blue skies,
Martin.
"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists