[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090525135012.13be624c@mjolnir.ossman.eu>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 13:50:12 +0200
From: Pierre Ossman <pierre@...man.eu>
To: Wolfgang Mües <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de>
Cc: "David Brownell" <david-b@...bell.net>,
"Matt Fleming" <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Mike Frysinger" <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc_spi: use EILSEQ for possible transmission errors
On Mon, 25 May 2009 12:18:18 +0200
Wolfgang Mües <wolfgang.mues@...rswald.de> wrote:
>
> So if this code gets integrated, we can do:
>
> if (command is erase)
> accept erase response codes
> else
> treat erase response codes as transmission errors
>
> Should be no problem...
>
This furthers the layering violation though. I don't remember why
mmc_spi is looking at responses to begin with. It should be up to the
caller to interpret them.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by the
Swedish government. Make sure your server uses encryption
for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for end-to-end
encryption.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists