linux-kernel - Re: zero out blocks of freed user data for operation a virtual machine environment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090525123430.GA5534@cip.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
Date:	Mon, 25 May 2009 14:34:30 +0200
From:	Thomas Glanzmann <thomas@...nzmann.de>
To:	Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>, tytso@...nk.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: zero out blocks of freed user data for operation a virtual
	machine environment

Hello Ted,

> Yes, it does, sb_issue_discard().  So if you wanted to hook into this
> routine with a function which issued calls to zero out blocks, it
> would be easy to create a private patch.

that sounds good because it wouldn't only target the most used
filesystem but every other filesystem that uses the interface as well.
Do you think that a tunable or configurable patch has a chance to hit
upstream as well?

        Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/