[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090525160351.GB10431@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 18:03:51 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/X] ptrace: mv task_struct->ptrace
ptrace_task->pt_flags, kill ptrace_link()
On 05/25, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > struct ptrace_task {
> > + unsigned long pt_flags;
> > };
>
> > - return task->ptrace;
> > + return unlikely(task->ptrace_task) ?
> > + task->ptrace_task->pt_flags : 0;
>
> Please no pt_ prefixes. It is abundantly clear from the
> '->ptrace_ctx' portion already that it's about ptrace - the rest
> should be a straightforward minimalistic naming - i.e.
> ->ptrace_ctx->flags.
OK, will rename.
But note that you can't use cscope to find the usage of ->flags. Even
grep is not reliable, unless the code always adds 'ptrace' to the name
of the pointer.
> Also, is the conditional necessary? We should not be calling ptrace
> methods on tasks with no ptrace context.
It is mostly used as is_task_ptraced() actually, that is why ptrace context
can be NULL.
This in turn needs cleanups, will be addressed further.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists