linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 01:02:28 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc6: Reported regressions from 2.6.29

On Monday 25 May 2009, Frans Pop wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > If you know of any other unresolved regressions from 2.6.29, please let
> > me know either and I'll add them to the list.
> 
> It may be worth tracking a possible regression introduced with -rc6 as a 
> result of http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13259.
> 
> A new warning that was added in drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c 
> (commit 4973b22a: 'ACPI processor: reset the throttling state once it's 
> invalid') may be triggering in cases where it shouldn't. It seems to 
> trigger during boot and on 'cat /proc/acpi/processor/*/throttling'.
> Otherwise it's probably relatively harmless.
> 
> See the comments starting at #23 for details.

Hmm.  It's really better if you file a separate bug for that with a reference
to the previous discussion.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/