[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1243333072.4888.2.camel@varda>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 12:17:52 +0200
From: Alejandro Riveira Fernández
<alejandro.riveira@...il.com>
To: Ivo van Doorn <ivdoorn@...il.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linville@...driver.com, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Subject: Re: [2.6.27-rc7 vs 2.6.29 Regresion] Wifi Network Slownes rt2500pci
El mar, 26-05-2009 a las 10:58 +0200, Ivo van Doorn escribió:
> On Monday 25 May 2009, Alejandro Riveira Fernández wrote:
> > Would the output of this script[2] for 2.6.29.4 with and without the
> > revert help you ?
>
> Yes please try it. but for 2.6.29 you probably need attached script instead.
> I am not sure if it would produce something useful, because I think Johannes
> assertion is right. With his patch the correct bitmask is send to the driver
> and the driver actually needs _that_ bitmask without any editing
> (rather then the incorrect one which was send before that patch).
What causes the regression then?
Anyway For the script to work what config options do I need? debugfs?
Anything else ?
>
> Ivo
--
It's easy to make malloc() return NULL under Windows: there is no fork()
system call, and nobody expects the machine to stay up anyway, so who
cares? When you say "I wrote a program that crashed Windows", people
just stare at you blankly and say "Hey, I got those with the system,
*for free*".
Linus Torvalds
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (836 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists