[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200905261335.41643.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 13:35:41 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] asm-generic: add a dma-mapping.h file
On Tuesday 26 May 2009, FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> > dma_get_cache_alignment() is still less generic than
> > the other functions, as this is still architecture
> > specific. Should I leave that out as well then?
>
> Yes, I think that only adding generic functions is a better
> approach. Overriding with #ifdef is really ugly.
>
Ok, will do.
[trimming Cc list a bit, as the subject has changed]
Could you be more specific as to why you think the #ifdef
in this file is ugly? I agree that we should always avoid
#ifdef in a device driver file or around the usage of an
API, but we use it everywhere when defining an optional
API, e.g.
#ifdef CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
extern void dma_debug_add_bus(struct bus_type *bus);
#else
static inline void dma_debug_add_bus(struct bus_type *bus)
{
{
#endif
or
#ifndef clear_user_highpage
static inline void clear_user_highpage(struct page *page, unsigned long vaddr)
{
void *addr = kmap_atomic(page, KM_USER0);
clear_user_page(addr, vaddr, page);
kunmap_atomic(addr, KM_USER0);
}
#endif
This has always made a lot of sense to me when you are defining
something that you want to become a No-op in certain configurations
or that only needs special handling in a few cases. IIRC, Linus
has stated that he prefers the second of the two styles above when
you have the choice, which is why I started out that way, while
for the dma_debug stuff, the CONFIG_ symbol clearly makes sense.
Arnd <><
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists