lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 16:04:25 +0200
From:	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Marcel Holtmann <holtmann@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Zhu, Yi" <yi.zhu@...el.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linville@...driver.com" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: [PATCH] firmware: Allocate firmware id dynamically

Hi Andrew,

Since the firmware loader is not maintained by anyone, I'm sending this one to
you, for the next merge window:

From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>

The firmware loader has a statically allocated 30 bytes long string for the
firmware id (a.k.a. the firmware file name). There is no reason why we couldnt
allocate dynamically, and avoid having restrictions on the firmware names
lengths.
Please note that we have to keep the FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX definition around as
some drivers rely on it.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
---

 drivers/base/firmware_class.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
index d3a59c6..1f0daf9 100644
--- a/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
+++ b/drivers/base/firmware_class.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static int loading_timeout = 60;	/* In seconds */
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(fw_lock);
 
 struct firmware_priv {
-	char fw_id[FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX];
+	char *fw_id;
 	struct completion completion;
 	struct bin_attribute attr_data;
 	struct firmware *fw;
@@ -278,6 +278,7 @@ static void fw_dev_release(struct device *dev)
 {
 	struct firmware_priv *fw_priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
 
+	kfree(fw_priv->fw_id);
 	kfree(fw_priv);
 	kfree(dev);
 
@@ -309,7 +310,13 @@ static int fw_register_device(struct device **dev_p, const char *fw_name,
 
 	init_completion(&fw_priv->completion);
 	fw_priv->attr_data = firmware_attr_data_tmpl;
-	strlcpy(fw_priv->fw_id, fw_name, FIRMWARE_NAME_MAX);
+	fw_priv->fw_id = kstrdup(fw_name, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!fw_priv->fw_id) {
+		dev_err(device, "%s: Firmware name allocation failed\n",
+			__func__);
+		retval = -ENOMEM;
+		goto error_kfree;
+	}
 
 	fw_priv->timeout.function = firmware_class_timeout;
 	fw_priv->timeout.data = (u_long) fw_priv;
@@ -323,11 +330,14 @@ static int fw_register_device(struct device **dev_p, const char *fw_name,
 	retval = device_register(f_dev);
 	if (retval) {
 		dev_err(device, "%s: device_register failed\n", __func__);
-		goto error_kfree;
+		goto error_kfree_fw_id;
 	}
 	*dev_p = f_dev;
 	return 0;
 
+error_kfree_fw_id:
+	kfree(fw_priv->fw_id);
+
 error_kfree:
 	kfree(fw_priv);
 	kfree(f_dev);

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ