linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0905261318040.22176@gentwo.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 13:19:08 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
cc:	Pekka J Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>, npiggin@...e.de
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler fixes

On Mon, 25 May 2009, Matt Mackall wrote:

> > And oh, Christoph/Matt, can I have your NAK/ACK for this patch?
>
> Looks ok to me, though I'd probably split it into three parts (slab,
> slub, init).

Could we document the core boot strap procedure some more? I think we will
have slight breakage in various parts if we change the order. If we had
some design to guide then it may be easier to bring all the components in
order.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/