lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 13:24:46 -0400
From:	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
	Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>, uclinux-dev@...inux.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mtd/maps: uclinux: support Blackfin systems

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 13:06, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:50:51PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:47, Paul Mundt wrote:
>> > On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 12:42:48PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> > In this case you should just kill all of that crap off, and have the
>> >> > platforms that use this set uclinux_ram_map up themselves, it's already
>> >> > a global. Of course you can use _ebss as a default value for
>> >> > uclinux_ram_map.phys and just override it in your platform.
>> >>
>> >> i would agree if it were a board-specific issue, but it's an arch
>> >> issue, so pushing it to the boards level is wrong. ??i can however
>> >> replace the addr with a global weak and add a symbol into the Blackfin
>> >> arch code to override it.
>> >>
>> > I obviously meant architectures setting up the address, not the board
>> > code, as this has nothing at all to do with boards. There are already
>> > plenty of cases in setup_arch() for filling in uclinux mtd data, one more
>> > isn't going to make a difference.
>> >
>> > I don't see anything wrong with keeping uclinux_ram_map as a global
>> > however, particularly since platforms that need to special case the
>> > mapping can easily do this under the existing ifdef. Adding weak symbols
>> > for something like this just seems silly.
>>
>> the point of the weak symbol was so that the map could provide a sane
>> default that works for most everyone out there without having to copy
>> & paste the same code to every arch, and to make new arch porters
>> worry about what needs to be done to use this very trivial map
>
> Did you purposely only read the parts of my email that you felt like?
> Note the original quoted part that mentions using _ebss as a default and
> simply overriding it in your platform.

if i wanted to piss you off, i imagine that would be what i was doing.
 but considering my purpose is to get merged, there's a more logical
conclusion.  we envisioned different solutions, so having the ideas in
our minds not line up isnt terribly surprising.

> Use the attached, and then just set uclinux_ram_map.phys = your_address_here
> in your setup_arch(). Having weak symbols in drivers that are supposed to
> be overriden by the architecture code is just way too backwards for
> words. Globals suffice fine for this sort of thing, if you are not going
> to go to the effort to pass this information to the driver directly that
> is.

i was thinking something else, but obviously this is nicer than what i
was thinking
-mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ