linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] tracing/core: various fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090526200640.GD5969@nowhere>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 22:06:41 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
	Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] tracing/core: various fixes

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 03:46:24PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> 
> I'm just coming back off of a holiday.
> 
> 
> On Tue, 26 May 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 
> > Hi Ingo, Steven,
> > 
> > I've gathered various tracing fixes that were posted recently.
> > 
> > Note: the commit b11c53e12f94a46b50bccc7a1a953d7ca1d54a31
> > 	(ftrace: Add task_comm support for trace_event)
> >       looks good to me. This v3 solves the two following unhandled
> >       dependencies in v1:
> > 
> > ENABLE_EVENT_TRACING -> CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER
> > EVENT_TRACING -> CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER
> > 
> > The latter is tricky because CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER depends
> > on CONFIG_FTRACE (the tracers menu) from which EVENT_TRACING
> > is excluded. A build error can then occur if something selects
> > CONFIG_TRACING elsewhere.
> > 
> > The fix written by Zhaolei follows the {ENABLE_}EVENT_TRACING
> > view: we now have CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER and ENABLE_CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER.
> > 
> > The former is used by EVENT_TRACING to record cmdlines.
> > The latter selects CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER plus CONFIG_TRACING.
> > To sum up, ENABLE_CONTEXT_SWITCH_TRACER acts only as a "relay".
> 
> The sched_switch tracer is very light weight. Not sure we need to keep
> it separate.
> 
> Basically, when tracing is enabled, we should simply get the event tracer 
> and the sched_switch tracer for free. The configs get a bit tricky with 
> dependencies. I'll take a look at it.
> 
> -- Steve


So, should I zap these patches from the pull request?
Or do you think about a delta solution?

Thanks,
Frederic.

 
> > 
> > It looks good to me, tell me and Zhaolei if you have doubts
> > about it.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> > 
> > The following changes since commit 5537937696c55530447c20aa27daccb8d0d29b33:
> >   Ming Lei (1):
> >         ftrace: fix check for return value of register_module_notifier in event_trace_init
> > 
> > are available in the git repository at:
> > 
> >   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/frederic/random-tracing.git
> > 	tracing/core
> > 
> > Lai Jiangshan (1):
> >       tracing: add trace_event_read_lock()
> > 
> > Li Zefan (1):
> >       tracing/events: change the type of __str_loc_item to unsigned short
> > 
> > Pekka Enberg (1):
> >       kmemtrace: fix kernel parameter documentation
> > 
> > Zhaolei (2):
> >       ftrace: Add task_comm support for trace_event
> >       ftrace: clean up of using ftrace_event_enable_disable()
> > 
> >  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt |   10 --------
> >  include/trace/ftrace.h              |    2 +-
> >  kernel/trace/Kconfig                |    9 +++++-
> >  kernel/trace/trace.c                |    8 ++++++
> >  kernel/trace/trace_events.c         |   42 +++++++++++++---------------------
> >  kernel/trace/trace_output.c         |   25 +++++++++++++++-----
> >  kernel/trace/trace_output.h         |    2 +
> >  7 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
> > 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/