[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0905261655120.26705@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 16:56:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>,
Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] tracing/events: make __string() more general
On Tue, 26 May 2009, Li Zefan wrote:
> This changes __string(..., src) to __string(..., len), thus makes it more
> general, and then block TRACE_EVENT() can use it.
>
> Also introduce __fetch_str(), which is used in TP_assign() and returns
> the address of the string, while __get_str() is used in TP_print().
>
> [ Impact: TRACE_EVENT api change ]
What's the reason for the change?
Is it to handle NULL pointers? If so, lets change the ftrace.h to handle
it instead.
This is why I like the Impact line really be a "rational" line.
"TRACE_EVENT api change" is meaningless to me.
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists