[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090526140408.6c829124.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:04:08 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
Cc: lizf@...fujitsu.com, davem@...emloft.net, tgraf@...g.ch,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cls_cgroup: read classid atomically in classifier
On Tue, 26 May 2009 12:59:11 -0700
Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com> wrote:
> Avoid reading the unsynchronized value cs->classid multiple times,
> since it could change concurrently from non-zero to zero; this would
> result in the classifier returning a positive result with a bogus
> (zero) classid.
When this race occurs, what are the user-visible consequences?
People who need to decide to which kernels a patch should be applied
like to know such things.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists