linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] lib : provide a more precise radix_tree_gang_lookup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20090526143058.c59e6dc1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 14:30:58 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>
Cc:	cl@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shijie8@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib : provide a more precise
 radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot

On Mon, 25 May 2009 11:53:55 +0800
Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com> wrote:

> 	The origin radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() tries to
> lookup max_items slots.But there are maybe holes for
> find_get_pages_contig() which will only use the contiguous part.
> 
> 	So a more precise radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot() is needed
> to avoid unneccessary search work.
> 

OK..

> diff --git a/include/linux/radix-tree.h b/include/linux/radix-tree.h
> index 355f6e8..03e25f4 100644
> --- a/include/linux/radix-tree.h
> +++ b/include/linux/radix-tree.h
> @@ -164,7 +164,8 @@ radix_tree_gang_lookup(struct radix_tree_root *root, void **results,
>  			unsigned long first_index, unsigned int max_items);
>  unsigned int
>  radix_tree_gang_lookup_slot(struct radix_tree_root *root, void ***results,
> -			unsigned long first_index, unsigned int max_items);
> +			unsigned long first_index, unsigned int max_items,
> +			int contig);

Variable `contig' could have the type `bool'.  Did you consider and
reject that option, or just didn't think of it?


> ...
> +			if (contig)
> +				goto out;
> +
> +		} else if (contig) {
> +			index--;
> +			goto out;
> +
> +		if (contig) {
> +			if (slots_found == 0)
> +				break;
> +			if (next_index & RADIX_TREE_MAP_MASK)
> +				break;
> +		}
> -				(void ***)pages, start, nr_pages);
> +				(void ***)pages, start, nr_pages, 0);
> -				(void ***)pages, index, nr_pages);
> +				(void ***)pages, index, nr_pages, 1);

The patch adds cycles in some cases and saves them in others.

Does the saving exceed the adding?  How do we know that the patch is a
net benefit?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/