[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1243373730.8400.26.camel@gaiman.anholt.net>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:35:30 -0700
From: Eric Anholt <eric@...olt.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...artin.ca>, airlied@...hat.com,
dri-devel@...ts.sf.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, stable@...nel.org,
hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk, linux-mm@...ck.org,
shaohua.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm: i915: ensure objects are allocated below 4GB on
PAE
On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 21:17 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-05-26 at 12:27 -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> > From: Kyle McMartin <kyle@...hat.com>
> >
> > Ensure we allocate GEM objects below 4GB on PAE machines, otherwise
> > misery ensues. This patch is based on a patch found on dri-devel by
> > Shaohua Li, but Keith P. expressed reticence that the changes unfairly
> > penalized other hardware.
> >
> > (The mm/shmem.c hunk is necessary to ensure the DMA32 flag isn't used
> > by the slab allocator via radix_tree_preload, which will hit a
> > WARN_ON.)
>
> Why is this, is the gart not PAE friendly?
>
> Seems to me its a grand way of promoting 64bit hard/soft-ware.
No, the GART's fine. But the APIs required to make the AGP code
PAE-friendly got deprecated, so the patches to fix the AGP code got
NAKed, and Venkatesh never sent out his patches to undeprecate the APIs
and use them.
It's been like 6 months now, and it's absurd. I'd like to see this
patch go in so people's graphics can start working again and stop
corrupting system memory.
--
Eric Anholt
eric@...olt.net eric.anholt@...el.com
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists