lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830905261506x480f2167naf1034177bbc7036@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 26 May 2009 15:06:25 -0700
From:	Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	Balbir Singh <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroups: handle failure of cgroup_populate_dir() at 
	mount/remount

On Fri, May 22, 2009 at 1:25 AM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
<kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> Hm, shouldn't we allow "noprefix" to be effective only agaisnt cpuset ?
> I think it's just for backward-compatibility of cpuset.
> (I don't like the option at all.)

Yes, exposing the "noprefix" option externally was one of the mistakes
I made when developing cgroups.

It seems to me really unlikely that anyone is using "noprefix" for
anything other than implicitly when mounting the "cpuset" filesystem.
So I'd be inclined to just forbid it if we're mounting more than just
the cpuset subsystem. A bit of a nasty abstraction violation, but it
makes more sense overall. The only problem is that someone *might* be
using it - do we have any way to determine how, and how big do they
have to be before we care?

Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ