[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090526222251.GH5969@nowhere>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 00:22:52 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Zhaolei <zhaolei@...fujitsu.com>,
Tom Zanussi <tzanussi@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL v2][PATCH 0/10] tracing/core: various fixes
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 05:30:43PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> On Tue, 26 May 2009, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Steven Rostedt (5):
> > tracing: add __print_flags for events
> > tracing: add previous task state info to sched switch event
> > tracing: add flag output for kmem events
> > tracing: add __print_symbolic to trace events
> > tracing: convert irq events to use __print_symbolic
> >
> > Zhaolei (2):
> > ftrace: Add task_comm support for trace_event
> > ftrace: clean up of using ftrace_event_enable_disable()
>
> BTW, these are in tip/tracing/ftrace :-/
Yes. I prepared the first request against tracing/core
and have discovered today what was in tracing/ftrace :)
But Zhaolei's patches are not the same. The v1 is on
tracing/ftrace, it doesn't contain the fix for the build
error. Then Ingo suggested me to cherry-pick the missing
patches in tracing/core from tracing/ftrace. And here came
the second pull request.
So, may be I should send a new request containing the last
fixes but against tracing/ftrace. So that we'll have
the same result without the kconfig tricks that solve the
build error.
Hm?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists