linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4A1C6FE9.1050003@googlemail.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2009 00:40:41 +0200
From:	Michael Riepe <michael.riepe@...glemail.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	mb@...sch.de, dave@...dillows.org, romieu@...zoreil.com,
	rsantos@...popie.com, m.bueker@...lin.de,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.30-rc4] r8169: avoid losing MSI interrupts



David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 14:52:11 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> 
>>From: Michael Buesch <mb@...sch.de>
>>Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 20:22:23 +0200
>>
>>
>>>I didn't notice a CC:stable.
>>>I think this should also go to stable.
>>>Does somebody take care?
>>
>>I'll queue it up.
> 
> 
> Actually, this patch doesn't even remotely come close to applying
> to 2.6.29.4

Michael Buesch already provided a patch against 2.6.29.4 that we both
tested. I doubt that it will apply to 2.6.27 cleanly, though.

-- 
Michael "Tired" Riepe <michael.riepe@...glemail.com>
X-Tired: Each morning I get up I die a little
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/