[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090526234436.GB23806@hallyn.com>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 18:44:36 -0500
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, xemul@...allels.com,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/38] C/R: core stuff
Quoting Alexey Dobriyan (adobriyan@...il.com):
> And since you guys showed that just idea of in-kernel checkpointing is not
> rejected outright, it doesn't mean that you can drag every single idea too.
Can you rephrase here? I have no idea what you mean by 'drag every single
idea'
> Because history shows, that once something (especially user-visible,
> like restart syscall semantics) is in kernel it's nearly impossible
> to cut it out, so it's very-very important to get it right from the very
> beginning.
Absolutely agree (at least in terms of the API for sys_restart() and
sys_checkpoint(), not for inane other stuff like whether there is a
CKPT_OBJ_RESTART_BLOCK). That is why 6 months ago we were trying to
get to an agreement with Andrey Mirkin about a precise API that would
definately suit both approaches (in-kernel and userspace task recreation
at sys_restart). That way the basics could go upstream and the rest
could get settled later as we see the fallout from either decision.
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists