[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A1CAF44.7000002@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:11:00 +0800
From: Amerigo Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
CC: linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, jdike@...toit.com, mingo@...e.hu,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch 4/4] module: trim exception table in module_free()
Rusty Russell wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2009 06:05:39 pm Amerigo Wang wrote:
>
>> void module_free(struct module *mod, void *module_region)
>> {
>> vfree(module_region);
>> - /* FIXME: If module_region == mod->init_region, trim exception
>> - table entries. */
>> + if (module_region == mod->module_init)
>> + mod->num_exentries = 0;
>> }
>>
>
> Hi Amerigo,
>
> This looks wrong. The extable covers both init and core exception entries.
> We want to remove the ones in the module_init section. The good news is that
> it's sorted, so they're either at the start or the end (except sparc 32).
>
Hi, Rusty.
Yes? The extable of a module is in '__ex_table' section, and during the
section transfer, one
section will be either in module_init or module_core, so its entries are
only in one of them,
not both, right?
Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists