[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20090526225720.a1f47b4e.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2009 22:57:20 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Cc: ben-linux@...ff.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] S3C: beyond ARRAY_SIZE of s3c_gpios
On Wed, 20 May 2009 17:51:07 +0200 Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com> wrote:
> Do not go beyond ARRAY_SIZE of s3c_gpios
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/arch/arm/plat-s3c/gpio.c b/arch/arm/plat-s3c/gpio.c
> index d71dd6d..29926c1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/plat-s3c/gpio.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/plat-s3c/gpio.c
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ static __init void s3c_gpiolib_track(struct s3c_gpio_chip *chip)
>
> gpn = chip->chip.base;
> for (i = 0; i < chip->chip.ngpio; i++, gpn++) {
> - BUG_ON(gpn > ARRAY_SIZE(s3c_gpios));
> + BUG_ON(gpn >= ARRAY_SIZE(s3c_gpios));
> s3c_gpios[gpn] = chip;
> }
> }
umm, OK, but the title and changelog are quite inaccurate.
I rewrote the title to
s3c: fix check of index into s3c_gpios[]
and rewrote the changelog to
The check of the s3c_gpios[] index had an off-by-one.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists