[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A1CEC3D.5030908@panasas.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 10:31:09 +0300
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Subject: Re: [Bug #13175] sata_nv incompatible with async scsi scan
On May. 26, 2009, 21:47 +0300, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 May 2009, Benny Halevy wrote:
>> On May. 24, 2009, 22:31 +0300, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> wrote:
>>> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
>>> of regressions introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29.
>>>
>>> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
>>> introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
>>> be listed and let me know (either way).
>> Verified to still exist with 2.6.30-rc7 :-(
>>
>> [The bug description is misleading though. More testing
>> lead to post-kernel boot problems where initrd cannot find the sata
>> devices during its init phase]
>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> What description would be better in your opinion?
How about: initrd fails to find /dev/sda* (sata_nv)
Benny
>
> Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists