[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <de76405a0905270314x43ba3f77uae80676c4a83f0cd@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 11:14:30 +0100
From: George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@...citrix.com>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>
Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@...citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [GIT PULL] Xen APIC hooks (with io_apic_ops)
On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 10:19 PM, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com> wrote:
> Well. Xen *does* suffer from bad technical choices made years ago. I'm
> pretty sure Xen would look radically different when being rewritten from
> scratch today.
That may be. I don't know enough about the specific issues you raise
below to comment. But Ingo wasn't bringing up those issues: he was
disagreeing with the whole idea of including dom0 Linux as a key
component of the Xen system. If the Xen project were to start over
from scratch, we might make a lot of different decisions; but running
Linux as the hypervisor (as KVM does) or forking Linux (as Ingo seemed
to suggest) are not among them.
-George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists