linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -v3] flat: fix data sections alignment

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20090527114955.GA23343@emlix.com>
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2009 13:49:56 +0200
From:	Johannes Weiner <jw@...ix.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>, os@...ix.com,
	dhowells@...hat.com, rmk@....linux.org.uk, cooloney@...nel.org,
	geert@...ux-m68k.org, vapier.adi@...il.com, gerg@...inux.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v3] flat: fix data sections alignment

On Tue, May 05, 2009 at 04:08:47PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 04:25:53PM +0200, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:53:43PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Tue, 10 Mar 2009 16:33:50 +0900
> > > Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 06:00:59PM +0100, Oskar Schirmer wrote:
> > > > > The flat loader uses an architecture's flat_stack_align() to align the
> > > > > stack but assumes word-alignment is enough for the data sections.
> > > > > 
> > > > > However, on the Xtensa S6000 we have registers up to 128bit width
> > > > > which can be used from userspace and therefor need userspace stack and
> > > > > data-section alignment of at least this size.
> > > > > 
> > > > > This patch drops flat_stack_align() and uses the same alignment that
> > > > > is required for slab caches, ARCH_SLAB_MINALIGN, or wordsize if it's
> > > > > not defined by the architecture.
> > > > > 
> > > > > It also fixes m32r which was obviously kaput, aligning an
> > > > > uninitialized stack entry instead of the stack pointer.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Oskar Schirmer <os@...ix.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <jw@...ix.com>
> > > > > Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> > > > > Cc: Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>
> > > > > Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
> > > > > Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > > > > Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
> > > > > Cc: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>
> > > > > Cc: Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>
> > > > 
> > > > The updated version looks ok to me anyways, and it's certainly an
> > > > improvement over defining the same alignment requirements all over the
> > > > place.
> > > > 
> > > > Acked-by: Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
> > > 
> > > Quite a few people expressed quite a few reservations over v2.
> > > 
> > > Are we all OK with a v3 merge?
> > 
> > Paul and Mike had complaints.  Paul acked the last revision.  Mike?
> > We need this for upstream to compile on our configuration.
> 
> Can we get this merged?  Nobody complained.

<periodic echo-request>

What are the plans on this now?  I assume it drowned in other changes...
Is it too late to get this in .30 now?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/