[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4A1D3EEC.3050106@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 09:23:56 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tero.kristo@...ia.com, ext-eero.nurkkala@...ia.com,
venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [tip:timers/urgent] NOHZ: Properly feed cpufreq ondemand governor
tip-bot for Eero Nurkkala wrote:
> Commit-ID: cf1240033cc81216a18eec0ca71466f7fe4eeda8
> Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/cf1240033cc81216a18eec0ca71466f7fe4eeda8
> Author: Eero Nurkkala <ext-eero.nurkkala@...ia.com>
> AuthorDate: Mon, 25 May 2009 09:57:37 +0300
> Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> CommitDate: Wed, 27 May 2009 14:51:47 +0200
>
> NOHZ: Properly feed cpufreq ondemand governor
>
> A call from irq_exit() may occasionally pause the timing
> info for cpufreq ondemand governor. This results in the
> cpufreq ondemand governor to fail to calculate the
> system load properly. Thus, relocate the checks for this
> particular case to keep the governor always functional.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eero Nurkkala <ext-eero.nurkkala@...ia.com>
> Reported-by: Tero Kristo <tero.kristo@...ia.com>
> Acked-by: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
> Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venkatesh.pallipadi@...el.com>
> LKML-Reference: <12432346571351-git-send-email-ext-eero.nurkkala@...ia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
>
>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 12 +++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> index d3f1ef4..233b4e7 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c
> @@ -222,6 +222,15 @@ void tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(int inidle)
>
> cpu = smp_processor_id();
> ts = &per_cpu(tick_cpu_sched, cpu);
> +
> + /*
> + * Call to tick_nohz_start_idle stops the last_update_time from being
> + * updated. Thus, it must not be called in the event we are called from
> + * irq_exit() with the prior state different than idle.
> + */
> + if (!inidle && !ts->inidle)
> + return;
Calling return without restoring the
local_irq_save(flags) right above the
line where you get the CPU number seems
like a bad idea.
--
All rights reversed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists