linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 25/20] sysfs: Only support removing emtpy sysfs directories.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.0905271816200.2669-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Wed, 27 May 2009 18:18:55 -0400 (EDT)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
cc:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
	SCSI development list <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
	Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
	<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...stanetworks.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/20] sysfs: Only support removing emtpy sysfs  directories.

On Wed, 27 May 2009, Eric W. Biederman wrote:

> >> I think I have the fix to that...
> >
> > The fix is to delete the target when its children are deleted, and not
> > wait until the children are released.
> 
> I think I can do both.
> 
> I am currently working on a patchset which at the VFS layer disconnects a
> fd from an underlying device.  It does the necessary use count tracking
> and when the disconnect is done it returns.  As part of the disconnect it
> calls the release method.
> 
> We already do this in at least sysfs, proc, sysctl, and sound.  So I
> figure it is time to move this into some generic code so we don't need
> to duplicate the bugs and the insanities.
> 
> Once merged it would take just a few lines of code to use this functionality.

That's good, but it isn't enough to solve this problem.  Even though
user programs might not be able to pin the device by holding the file
open any more, other mechanisms (internal to the kernel) could have the
same effect.  Only a short delay is needed.

The underlying cause should be fixed properly.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/