[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090527231949.GB30002@elte.hu>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:19:49 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, stable@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hugh.dickins@...cali.co.uk,
Lee.Schermerhorn@...com, kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
starlight@...nacle.cx, ebmunson@...ibm.com, agl@...ibm.com,
apw@...onical.com, wli@...ementarian.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for hugetlbfs-related problems on shared
memory
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2009 12:12:27 +0100
> Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
>
> > The following two patches are required to fix problems reported by
> > starlight@...nacle.cx. The tests cases both involve two processes interacting
> > with shared memory segments backed by hugetlbfs.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Both of these address
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13302, yes? I added
> that info to the changelogs, to close the loop.
>
> Ingo, I'd propose merging both these together rather than routing
> one via the x86 tree, OK?
sure.
> Question is: when? Are we confident enough to merge it into
> 2.6.30 now, or should we hold off for 2.6.30.1? I guess we have a
> week or more, and if the changes do break something, we can fix
> that in 2.6.30.1 ;)
With an Acked-by from Hugh i feel pretty confident about it - and as
long as it get into -rc8 i think we should do it in .30.
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists