linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 May 2009 01:26:36 +0200
From:	Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	timur@...escale.com, scottwood@...escale.com,
	rmk+lkml@....linux.org.uk, jacmet@...site.dk,
	r.schwebel@...gutronix.de, devicetree-discuss@...abs.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, yuan-bo.ye@...orola.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform

On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 01:55:00PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > I asked what do drivers do when the MAC address is not in the OF
> > tree, and it is not programmed in hardware (any hardware).
>
> They either fail to probe the device or use a random MAC address,
> the later of which is severely frowned upon.

For embedded, having no dedicated eeprom for the MAC address but
defining them from the bootloader's configuration space is the standard
use case.

rsc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/