[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090527235704.GQ6805@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 01:57:05 +0200
From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...abs.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>,
Janboe Ye <yuan-bo.ye@...orola.com>,
Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 02:22:50PM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> 2) Driver binding mechanism: device tree nodes usually have a
> "compatible" property which is a list of strings. The first string
> describes exactly what the device is (ie. "atmel,24c08") and an
> optional list of other devices which it is register interface
> backwards compatible with.
This is a good example. The "exact" description above doesn't say
anything about some of the details the driver needs to know. Here is the
at24 driver:
http://lxr.linux.no/linux+v2.6.29/include/linux/i2c/at24.h#L18
Where do we get the page size & flags from?
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists