linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched: Support current clocksource handling in fallback sched

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1243503281.23657.80.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 28 May 2009 11:34:41 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Cc:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.ml.walleij@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
	Haavard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...el.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	John Stultz <johnstul@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: Support current clocksource handling in
 fallback sched_clock().

On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 18:19 +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:

> Ok, there were some ordering problems with the early platform code, but
> I've played with this a bit more and got it to the point where this now
> also works. I can live with this over the v3 version if people prefer
> this approach instead.
> 
> --

> @@ -38,8 +39,7 @@
>   */
>  unsigned long long __attribute__((weak)) sched_clock(void)
>  {
> -	return (unsigned long long)(jiffies - INITIAL_JIFFIES)
> -					* (NSEC_PER_SEC / HZ);
> +	return cyc2ns(sched_clocksource, clocksource_read(sched_clocksource));
>  }
>  
>  static __read_mostly int sched_clock_running;

> @@ -362,6 +363,9 @@ static struct clocksource *select_clocksource(void)
>  	if (next == curr_clocksource)
>  		return NULL;
>  
> +	if (next->flags & CLOCK_SOURCE_USE_FOR_SCHED_CLOCK)
> +		sched_clocksource = next;
> +
>  	return next;
>  }
>  

That's a single assignment, vs two reads on use. Should we be worried
about the SMP race where we observe two different sched_clocksource
pointers on read?


I would suggest we write it as:

u64 __weak sched_clock(void)
{
	struct clocksource *clock = ACCESS_ONCE(sched_clocksource);

	return cyc2ns(clock, clocksource_read(clock));
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/