[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090528103335.GW6805@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 12:33:35 +0200
From: Robert Schwebel <r.schwebel@...gutronix.de>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, devicetree-discuss@...abs.org,
linux@....linux.org.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk, scottwood@...escale.com,
yuan-bo.ye@...orola.com, timur@...escale.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] [PATCH] Device Tree on ARM platform
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 08:11:33PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The possibilities are endless. _BUT_ it does require some careful
> thinking to get things right. To that extent, I do agree with Russell
> that rather than a "violent" conversion, ARM should first try things out
> as an opt-in for a few platforms and see how it goes.
I think that the overall discussion goes into a very good direction.
The level of agreement is not as low as it might look like, I agree with
most of what David Gibson, benh and rmk have said so far; the problems
we've seen have been well identified. In the end it's probably a matter
of finding enough time to actually implement for example a prototype for
PXA.
rsc
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists