[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20090528114100.GA18744@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 13:41:00 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/12 v2] ptrace: mv task_struct->ptrace_message
ptrace_ctx->message
On 05/28, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> ptrace_event() can use current->ptrace_ctx safely. If mask == 0 and we do
> not check task_ptrace() we are called from tracehook_report_clone_complete(),
> in this case trace == T means current was traced when it called do_fork().
Perhaps it is better to optimize out "mask != 0" check in ptrace_event().
This special !mask case is only needed for _report_clone(), we can use
mask == PT_PTRACED instead.
Oleg.
--- PTRACE/include/linux/ptrace.h~10_HOOK_COMPLETE 2009-05-28 11:19:33.000000000 +0200
+++ PTRACE/include/linux/ptrace.h 2009-05-28 11:49:29.000000000 +0200
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ int generic_ptrace_pokedata(struct task_
*/
static inline int ptrace_event(int mask, int event, unsigned long message)
{
- if (mask && likely(!(task_ptrace(current) & mask)))
+ if (likely(!(task_ptrace(current) & mask)))
return 0;
current->ptrace_message = message;
ptrace_notify((event << 8) | SIGTRAP);
--- PTRACE/include/linux/tracehook.h~10_HOOK_COMPLETE 2009-05-28 08:41:11.000000000 +0200
+++ PTRACE/include/linux/tracehook.h 2009-05-28 11:50:14.000000000 +0200
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@ static inline void tracehook_report_clon
struct task_struct *child)
{
if (unlikely(trace))
- ptrace_event(0, trace, pid);
+ ptrace_event(PT_PTRACED, trace, pid);
}
/**
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists